#5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii sports upgrade

Now to carry this a bit further, I would go for the 90D all day long over the 6D2. You'll never use them again if you get the lens we suggested. Sell these lenses EF 35mm f1.8, EF 50mm 1.8 and the EF-S 18-55mm kit.

#5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii sports upgrade

I thing the upgrade to theВ Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens is the first way to go. They'll work on your APS-C cameras (even though their focal ranges may not be ideal in all cases), and you'll still be able to use them when/if you do buy a FF am sorta in the same camp as Robert. Whichever way you decide between the 90D and the 6D2, resolve to buy only full-frame (EF, not EF-S) lenses in the future. I think it might make more difference in the overall utility of your equipment.Д«ut since you evidently are considering FF but haven't made a final decision (a situation in which I once found myself), I'd recommend a different approach.

Instead, I'd suggest that you upgrade from your 18-55 kit lens to the much superior EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8. However, that's not what I'd recommend in that circumstance. If you were not considering a move to full-frame, the 90D would be a nice upgrade to your SL-2. If anyone could help me out in my decision that would be great.

The 11fps of the 90D sounds very appealing but so does the full-frame of the 6D mk ii. I mostly shoot sports and street photography and I am looking to upgrade the SL2.